YourNeedsMet provides an online, privacy‑focused questionnaire that gathers each party’s financial details and personal needs during divorce or separation. The platform uses this data to model fair asset division scenarios—including homes and pensions—highlighting when a non‑equal split may be more appropriate, and offers tailored next‑step recommendations such as vetted legal and financial services.
Funding
Funding not disclosed
Founders
Product
Problem
Divorcing or separating couples often face uncertainty when dividing assets, especially regarding the fair allocation of homes, pensions, and future financial stability. Traditional methods may default to a simple 50/50 split, which can overlook individual needs and circumstances, leading to perceived inequity and prolonged disputes.
Solution
YourNeedsMet offers an online, anonymous questionnaire that collects each party’s financial information and personal needs. Using this data, the platform generates a customized illustration of how assets—such as the family home and pension holdings—could be divided in a way that reflects each person’s situation. The tool highlights scenarios where a non‑equal split may be more appropriate and provides actionable next steps, including referrals to legal or financial professionals. By presenting clear, data‑driven options, it helps users understand potential outcomes and move forward with confidence.
Target Audience
Primary users are individuals undergoing divorce or separation who need clarity on asset division, as well as family law practitioners seeking a tool to assist clients in evaluating fair settlement options.
Features
- Simple, privacy‑focused questionnaire that captures income, assets, liabilities, and personal circumstances
- Scenario modeling that visualizes two separate household budgets based on the entered data
- Pension and retirement asset analysis that accounts for career breaks and future income needs
- Personalized recommendations for next actions, including links to vetted legal and financial services
- Interactive reports that explain why a 50/50 split may not be the fairest outcome in specific cases