Wehser provides the KI‑Integrationssystem (KIS), a coach‑supported process that helps schools and education authorities define clear AI integration goals, assign distributed responsibilities, and measure success by student learning outcomes. The offering includes a short kickoff workshop or a full‑day pedagogical session to create a common language, draft AI policies, and establish lightweight governance using existing school structures, all financed through standard professional‑development budgets with no lock‑in.
Funding
Funding not disclosed
Founders
Product
Problem
Schools face widespread use of AI tools by students and teachers without clear guidance, leading to uncertainty about legal, ethical, and pedagogical implications, and a lack of coordinated responsibility for AI integration.
Solution
Wehser.ai offers the KI‑Integrationssystem (KIS), a structured, coach‑supported school development process that helps schools and school authorities define clear AI integration goals, assign distributed responsibilities, and measure success by student learning outcomes. The process begins with a short, optional workshop or a full‑day pedagogical session to create a common language, assess the current state, and draft initial AI policies. Subsequent stages introduce role‑based governance, lightweight decision pathways that leverage existing school bodies, and iterative improvement cycles that turn AI integration into a sustainable practice rather than a one‑off project. All activities are financed through existing professional‑development budgets, require no proprietary software, and can be reversed or adapted without lock‑in.
Target Audience
Primary customers are individual school leaders and teaching teams seeking a coherent AI strategy, as well as school authorities or municipal education agencies that support multiple schools and want a common, scalable framework.
Features
- Two entry formats: a 2‑hour online/on‑site kickoff workshop or a 6‑7‑hour full‑day pedagogical day for the whole staff
- Structured three‑stage process (Explore, Implement, Improve) with clear deliverables such as AI policy drafts, defined governance roles, and pilot project plans
- Emphasis on learning‑outcome metrics as the primary success indicator, not tool compliance or checklist completion
- Integration with existing school committees and decision‑making bodies to avoid additional bureaucracy
- Reversible, modular design that allows schools to pause or adjust the process without contractual lock‑in
- Funding model aligned with standard teacher‑training budgets, eliminating the need for separate financing